Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2021.Sonova AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark B-Direct – Earlier EU figurative mark bizdirect – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).Case T-61/20.

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2021 –Sonova v EUIPO Digitmarket (B-Direct)

(Case T‑61/20)

(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark B-Direct – Earlier EU figurative mark bizdirect – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

1. EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Re-evaluation of the facts in the light of evidence produced for the first time before it – Precluded

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72)

(see para. 24)

2. EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 30-32, 103)

3. EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment – Composite mark

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 33, 58, 59, 67, 68)

4. EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services in question – Criteria for assessment

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 38, 39)

5. EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word mark B-Direct and figurative mark bizdirect

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 44, 52, 61, 64, 71, 94, 108)

6. EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Determination of the relevant public – Attention level of the public

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 49, 51)

7. EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Visual similarity between a figurative mark and a word mark

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

(see paras 74, 75)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 November 2019 (Case R 88/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Digitmarket – Sistemas de Informação and Sonova.

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Sonova AG to pay the costs.