Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2018.Claire Staelen v European Ombudsman.Appeal — Application for revision — Admissibility criteria.Case C-45/18 P.

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2018 — Staelen v Ombudsman

(Case C‑45/18 P) ( 1 )

(Appeal — Application for revision — Admissibility criteria)

1. Appeal — Grounds — Error of law relied on not identified — Ground lacking precision — Inadmissibility

(Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; European Data-protection Supervisor, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))

(see paras 14, 15, 66)

2. Judicial proceedings — Revision of a judgment — Grounds — Ground alleging the illegality of a provision of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Ground raised for the first time in revision proceedings — Inadmissibility

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 44; European Data-protection Supervisor, Art. 159)

(see paras 21-25)

3. Judicial proceedings — Revision of a judgment — Conditions for the admissibility thereof — New fact — Definition — Judgment of the Court of Justice — Not included

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 44; European Data-protection Supervisor, Art. 159)

(see paras 30-35)

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders Ms Claire Staelen to pay the costs.

( 1 ) OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.