Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 May 2017 —adp Gauselmann v EUIPO (MULTI FRUITS)
(Case T‑355/16)
(EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark MULTI FRUITS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
- EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Criteria
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c))
(see paras 19, 24, 35)
- EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Concept—Neologism consisting of elements descriptive of characteristics of the goods or services concerned
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c))
(see paras 20-23)
- EU trade mark—Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark—Absolute grounds for refusal—Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service—Word mark MULTI FRUITS
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c))
(see paras 25-28, 33, 36-39)
- EU trade mark—Decisions of the Office—Principle of equal treatment—Principle of sound administration—EUIPO’s previous decision-making practice—Principle of legality—Need for a strict and complete examination in each particular case
(see para. 40)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2016 (Case R 1043/2015-5) concerning an application for registration of the word sign MULTI FRUITS as an EU trade mark.
Operative part
The Court:
-
Dismisses the action;
-
Orders adp Gauselmann GmbH to pay the costs.