Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2017 — BASF v EUIPO — Evonik Industries (DINCH)
(Case T‑721/15)
(EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark DINCH — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptiveness — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009)
- EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Aim — Need to preserve availability
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(c), and 52(1)(a))
(see paras 18, 49)
- EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Concept
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(c), and 52(1)(a))
(see paras 19, 20, 24)
- EU trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service — Concept — Mark composed of a word or neologism resulting from a combination of elements
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(c), and 52(1)(a))
(see paras 21, 22)
- EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Registration contrary to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Assessment of the descriptive character of the trade mark — Criteria
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(c), and 52(1)(a))
(see para. 23)
- EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Registration contrary to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Word mark DINCH
(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(c), and 52(1)(a))
(see paras 38, 40-42, 50)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 September 2015 (Case R 2080/2014-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Evonik Industries and BASF.
Operative part
The Court:
-
Dismisses the action;
-
Orders BASF SE to pay the costs.