Case C‑216/18 PPU
LM
(Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(3) — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal)
Summary — Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 25 July 2018
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling—Urgent preliminary ruling procedure—Conditions—Person deprived of liberty—Outcome of the dispute liable to have an effect on that deprivation of liberty
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 107)
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters—Framework decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States—Surrender of convicted or suspected persons to the issuing judicial authorities—Obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles—Scope—Limits
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; Council Framework Decision 2002/584, as amended by Framework Decision 2009/299, Art. 1(3))
Member States—Obligations—Provision of remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection—Scope
(Arts 2 TEU and 19 TEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47, second para.)
EU law—Principles—Right to effective judicial protection—Principle of judicial independence—Scope
(Art. 19(2), third subpara., TEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47, second para.)
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters—Framework decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States—Surrender of convicted or suspected persons to the issuing judicial authorities—Obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles—Consequences of finding a risk of breach of the right of access to an independent tribunal
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47, second para.; Council Framework Decision 2002/584, as amended by Framework Decision 2009/299, Art. 1(3))
Judicial cooperation in criminal matters—Framework decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States—Surrender of convicted or suspected persons to the issuing judicial authorities—Obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles—Right of access to an independent and impartial tribunal—Risk of breach of that right on account of systemic or generalised deficiencies concerning the independence of the issuing Member State’s judiciary—Verification by the executing judicial authority—Scope—Consequences
(Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47, second para.; Council Framework Decision 2002/584, as amended by Framework Decision 2009/299, Arts 1(3) and 15(2))
See the text of the decision.
(see paras 28-31)
See the text of the decision.
(see paras 41-45)
See the text of the decision.
(see paras 48-52)
See the text of the decision.
(see paras 53, 54, 63-67)
The high level of trust between Member States on which the European arrest warrant mechanism is based is thus founded on the premiss that the criminal courts of the other Member States — which, following execution of a European arrest warrant, will have to conduct the criminal procedure for the purpose of prosecution, or of enforcement of a custodial sentence or detention order, and the substantive criminal proceedings — meet the requirements of effective judicial protection, which include, in particular, the independence and impartiality of those courts. It must, accordingly, be held that the existence of a real risk that the person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued will, if surrendered to the issuing judicial authority, suffer a breach of his fundamental right to an independent tribunal and, therefore, of the essence of his fundamental right to a fair trial, a right guaranteed by the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter, is capable of permitting the executing judicial authority to refrain, by way of exception, from giving effect to that European arrest warrant, on the basis of Article 1(3) of Framework Decision 2002/584.
(see paras 58, 59)
Article 1(3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that, where the executing judicial authority, called upon to decide whether a person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution is to be surrendered, has material, such as that set out in a reasoned proposal of the European Commission adopted pursuant to Article 7 (1) TEU, indicating that there is a real risk of breach of the fundamental right to a fair trial guaranteed by the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, on account of systemic or generalised deficiencies so far as concerns the independence of the issuing Member State’s judiciary, that authority must determine, specifically and precisely, whether, having regard to his personal situation, as well as to the nature of the offence for which he is being prosecuted and the factual context that form the basis of the European arrest warrant, and in the light of the information provided by the issuing Member State pursuant to Article 15(2) of Framework Decision 2002/584, as amended, there are substantial grounds for believing that that person will run such a risk if he is surrendered to that State.
Furthermore, the executing judicial authority must, pursuant to Article 15(2) of Framework Decision 2002/584, request from the issuing judicial authority any supplementary information that it considers necessary for assessing whether there is such a risk. If the information which the issuing judicial authority, after having, if need be, sought assistance from the central authority or one of the central authorities of the issuing Member State, as referred to in Article 7 of Framework Decision 2002/584 (see, to that effect, judgment of 5 April 2016, Aranyosi and Căldăraru, C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU, EU:C:2016:198, paragraph 97), has sent to the executing judicial authority does not lead the latter to discount the existence of a real risk that the individual concerned will suffer in the issuing Member State a breach of his fundamental right to an independent tribunal and, therefore, of the essence of his fundamental right to a fair trial, the executing judicial authority must refrain from giving effect to the European arrest warrant relating to him.
(see paras 76, 78, 79, operative part)