Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 November 2016.Polo Club v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark POLO CLUB SAINT-TROPEZ HARAS DE GASSIN — Earlier EU figurative marks BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Production of additional evidence — Discretion conferred by Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Remittal of the case in part to the Opposition Division — Article 64(1) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009.Case T-67/15.

Judgment // 10/11/2016 // 1 min read
bookmark 38 citations

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Do you want to help improving EUR-Lex ? This is a list of experimental features that you can enable. These features are still under development; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability. Don’t forget to give your feedback!

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

EU law

EU case-law

Official Journal

National law and case-law

Information

Document 62015TJ0067