Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2005.A. Tempelman (C-96/03) and Mr and Mrs T.H.J.M. van Schaijk (C-97/03) v Directeur van de Rijksdienst voor de keuring van Vee en Vlees.Reference for a preliminary ruling: College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven - Netherlands.Agriculture - Control of foot-and-mouth disease - Protective measures adopted in addition to the measures provided for in Directive 85/511/EEC - Powers of the Member States.Joined cases C-96/03 and C-97/03.

Judgment // 10/03/2005 // 2 min read
bookmark 8 citations

Joined Cases C-96/03 and C-97/03

A. Tempelman and Mr and Mrs T.H.J.M. van Schaijk

v

Directeur van de Rijksdienst voor de keuring van Vee en Vlees

(References for a preliminary ruling from theCollege van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven)

(Agriculture – Control of foot-and-mouth disease – Protective measures adopted in addition to the measures provided for in Directive 85/511/EEC – Powers of the Member States)

Opinion of Advocate General Poiares Maduro delivered on 2 December 2004

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 10 March 2005.

Summary of the Judgment

Agriculture – Approximation of laws – Control of foot-and-mouth disease – Directive 85/511 – Additional national measures to control the disease based on Directive 90/425 – Whether permissible – Conditions

(Council Directives 85/511, as amended by Directive 90/423, and 90/425, Art. 10(1))

Since foot-and-mouth disease is a disease which constitutes a serious hazard for animals, Article 10 (1) of Directive 90/425 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market confers on Member States the power to adopt measures to control the disease in addition to those provided for in Directive 85/511 introducing Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease, as amended by Directive 90/423. Member States have, in particular, the power to order the slaughter of animals belonging to a holding adjacent to or within a specific radius of a holding containing infected animals.

Such measures must however be adopted in compliance with the objectives pursued by the Community rules in force and, more particularly, Directive 85/511, as amended by Directive 90/423, the general principles of Community law, such as the principle of proportionality, and the obligation to communicate laid down in Article 10 (1) of Directive 90/425.

(see para. 52, operative part)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)10 March 2005(1)

(Agriculture – Control of foot-and-mouth disease – Protective measures adopted in addition to the measures provided for in Directive 85/511/EEC – Powers of the Member States)

v

THE COURT (Third Chamber),,

after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 2 December 2004,

gives the following