Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2003. Verband der freien Rohrwerke eV, Eisen- und Metallwerke Ferndorf GmbH and Rudolf Flender GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities. Control of concentrations - Concentration partly covered by the ECSC Treaty and partly by the EC Treaty - Authorisation decision on the basis of Article 66(2) CS - Decision on compatibility with the common market on the basis of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 - Conditions of admissibility according to the ECSC Treaty and the EC Treaty - Relationship between the systems for the control of concentrations laid down by the ECSC Treaty and the EC Treaty - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment. Case T-374/00.

Judgment // 08/07/2003 // 2 min read
bookmark 6 citations

«(Control of concentrations – Concentration partly covered by the ECSC Treaty and partly by the EC Treaty – Authorisation decision on the basis of Article 66(2) CS – Decision on compatibility with the common market on the basis of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 – Conditions of admissibility according to the ECSC Treaty and the EC Treaty – Relationship between the systems for the control of concentrations laid down by the ECSC Treaty and the EC Treaty – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment)»

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber)8 July 2003(1)

((Control of concentrations – Concentration partly covered by the ECSC Treaty and partly by the EC Treaty – Authorisation decision on the basis of Article 66(2) CS – Decision on compatibility with the common market on the basis of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 – Conditions of admissibility according to the ECSC Treaty and the EC Treaty – Relationship between the systems for the control of concentrations laid down by the ECSC Treaty and the EC Treaty – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment))

applicants,

v

defendant,

interveners,

THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Third Chamber),

having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 16 January 2003

gives the following

On those grounds,

THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber)

Lenaerts

Azizi

Jaeger

H. Jung

K. Lenaerts

Registrar

President