«(State aid – Commission’s lack of competence – Infringement of the rights of the defence – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Concept of aid – Infringement of Articles 87 EC and 295 EC – Market economy investor – Appropriate rate of return – Infringement of the obligation to state reasons)»
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)6 March 2003 (1)
((State aid – Commission’s lack of competence – Infringement of the rights of the defence – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Concept of aid – Infringement of Articles 87 EC and 295 EC – Market economy investor – Appropriate rate of return – Infringement of the obligation to state reasons))
applicants,
intervener,
v
defendant,
intervener,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Second Chamber, Extended Composition),
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 5 and 6 June 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber, Extended Composition)
Moura Ramos
Tiili
Pirrung
Mengozzi
Meij
H. Jung
R.M. Moura Ramos
Registrar
President