Judgment of the Court of 26 March 1996. The Queen v H. M. Treasury, ex parte British Telecommunications plc. Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division - United Kingdom. Reference for a preliminary ruling - Interpretation of Directive 90/531/EEC - Telecommunications - Transposition into national law - Obligation to pay compensation in the event of incorrect implementation. Case C-392/93.

Judgment // 26/03/1996 // 1 min read
bookmark 6 citations

«(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Interpretation of Directive 90/531/EEC – Telecommunications – Transposition into national law – Obligation to pay compensation in the event of incorrect implementation)»

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT26 March 1996 (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling – Interpretation of Directive 90/531/EEC – Telecommunications – Transposition into national law – Obligation to pay compensation in the event of incorrect implementation))

In Case C-392/93,

and

THE COURT,,

after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:

having regard to the Report for the Hearing,

after hearing the oral observations of British Telecommunications plc, represented by G. Barling QC, T. Sharpe and H. Davies, the United Kingdom, represented b y J. Collins, K.P.E. Lasok QC and S. Richards, Barrister, the German Government, represented by E. Röder, Ministerialrat in the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs, acting as Agent, the Italian Government, represented by I. Braguglia, Avvocato dello Stato, and the Commission, represented by H. van Lier and D. McIntyre, at the hearing on 26 October 1994,

after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 28 November 1995,

gives the following

On those grounds,

THE COURT,

Rodríguez Iglesias

Kakouris

Edward

Puissochet

Mancini

Schockweiler

Moitinho de Almeida

Gulmann

Murray

R. Grass G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias

Registrar

President