9.6.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 220/38
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — 2020 report on the State of the Energy Union pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 on Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action’
(COM(2020) 950 final)
and on ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — An EU-wide assessment of National Energy and Climate Plans: Driving forward the green transition and promoting economic recovery through integrated energy and climate planning’
(COM(2020) 564 final)
(2021/C 220/04)
Rapporteur:TBL
Referrals
European Commission, 11.11.2020 and 27.11.2020
Legal basis
Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Section responsible
Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society
Adopted in section
9.3.2021
Adopted at plenary
24.3.2021
Plenary session No
559
Outcome of vote
(for/against/abstentions)
236/4/6
1. Conclusions and recommendations
1.9. —
facilitating employment transitions;
—
supporting workers who lose their jobs as a result of decarbonisation (at the very least, a lost job should be compensated for with another, equivalent job);
—
combating energy poverty and offsetting degressive distributional effects; and
—
developing the regional economic potential arising from renewable energy sources and new forms of participation in electricity production.
2. General comments on the Commission document
2.1. —
energy security, including by reducing dependence on energy imports;
—
a fully integrated European energy market;
—
a sustainable, low-carbon and climate-friendly economy;
—
research, innovation and competitiveness to enable Europe to become a global leader in renewable energy;
—
a European labour force with the skills for the energy system of tomorrow;
—
investor confidence through price signals that reflect long- term needs and policy objectives.
2.4. —
Decarbonisation (including development of renewable energy)
—
Energy efficiency, with particular attention to the ‘Energy Efficiency First’ principle
—
Energy security (including cutting EU energy imports, increased flexibility and greater resilience of national energy systems)
—
Internal energy markets
—
Research & innovation and competitiveness
It also addresses the topic of ‘The Energy Union in a broader Green Deal perspective’.
2.13. 3. The EESC’s general comments
3.5. Failure to implement the ‘Energy Union with citizens at its core’ goal
3.9. Failure to implement the ‘security of supply/reduction of energy imports’ goal
3.11. Failure to implement the ‘innovation, global leadership’ goal
3.13. Social and regional policy relevance of the Energy Union
3.19. 4. Specific comments
The ‘Decarbonisation’ chapter of the State of the Energy Union report
4.1. The ‘Energy security’ chapter of the State of the Energy Union report
4.4. The ‘Internal energy markets’ chapter in the State of the Energy Union report and the progress report on the internal energy market
4.14. The ‘Research & innovation and competitiveness’ chapter in the State of the Energy Union report
4.15. The ‘Energy Union in a broader Green Deal perspective’ chapter in the State of the Energy Union report
4.16. The Communication on the assessment of NECPs
4.21. Brussels, 24 March 2021.
The President of the European Economic and Social Committee
Christa SCHWENG
(1) COM(2015) 80 final.
(2) OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1.
(3) COM(2020) 950 final, Annex 2.
(4) Which is surprising, given that there has been talk for more than thirty years about the need to phase out environmentally harmful subsidies in the EU.
(5) And the German Council presidency.
(6) OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 125.
(7) OJ C 47, 11.2.2020, p. 30, OJ C 62, 15.2.2019, p. 269.
(8) OJ C 429, 11.12.2020, p. 85.
(9) COM(2015) 80 final, p. 13.
(10) OJ C 429, 11.12.2020, p. 85.
(11) See Hirschl, B., Aretz, A., Bost, M., Tapia, M., and Gößling-Reisemann, S. (2018): Vulnerabilität und Resilienz des digitalen Stromsystems. Schlussbericht. Berlin, Bremen, available for download at: www.strom-resilienz.de
(12) OJ C 123, 9.4.2021, p. 30.
(13) OJ C 123, 9.4.2021, p. 22.
(14) OJ C 82, 3.3.2016, p. 13.
(15) OJ C 364, 28.10.2020, p. 158.
(16) OJ C 288, 31.8.2017, p. 91.
(17) OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 51.
(18) OJ C 81, 2.3.2018, p. 44.